Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Eden Wood Interview


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n81tnK3q-w0&feature=related

The Youtube video above is about a young child star, Eden Wood, who has appeared on the TLC show, “Toddlers and Tiaras.” It is an interview about her titles as a child pageant star and her life off the stage. The video clip also contains finished pictures of Eden in her costumes. We have selected some of the viewer comments as shown above. What issue are the commenters arguing against or for? Is there agreement or discord among the commenters? Which, if any, of the commenters make the strongest argument? What about their argument makes it compelling? Who do you think the video clip is geared towards? Of the arguments that are bad, what are they lacking? Do you think any of the comments are rude or inappropriate? If so, why?

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

JesusWeen!


JesusWeen!

http://jesusween.com/about

JesusWeen is a non profit organization also known as JesusWin. We are focused on helping people live better lives through the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. JesusWeen is a God-given vision which was born as an answer to the cry of many every October 31st. The dictionary meaning of Ween is to expect, believe or think. We therefore see October 31st as a day to expect a gift of salvation and re-think receiving Jesus.

Every year, the world and its system have a day set aside (October 31st) to celebrate ungodly images and evil characters while Christians all over the world participate, hide or just stay quiet on Halloween day. Being a day that is widely acceptable to solicit and knock on doors, God inspired us to encourage Christians to use this day as an opportunity to spread the gospel. The days of hiding are over and we choose to take a stand for Jesus. “Evil prevails when good people do nothing”. JesusWeen is expected to become the most effective Christian outreach day ever and that is why we also call it” World Evangelism Day”.

________________________________________________________________

JesusWeen is a nonprofit organization, that promotes Christianity and strives to better the lives of people through Jesus Christ. The people of this organization perceive Halloween to be evil and ungodly, perhaps to an extreme level. They seek to fix the problem of Halloween's unholiness by inventing an alternate holiday described as JesusWeen, or "JesusWin." The way the organization describes the purpose of this holiday, as a rallying call for all devoted Christians to announce the evil incorporated into Halloween. JesusWeen thinks of themselves and their mission as better than the people who choose to celebrate the traditional Halloween. Instead of making JesusWeen a holiday for individual reflection and appreciation of Jesus, they seem to be creating this holiday with the purpose of recruiting more believers to support there cause. Is this holiday Christian propaganda or an alternate religious option to Halloween. Is it the church's responsibility to change an innocent holiday apart from something sinister and evil into something more moral based? What audience is this targeting? Is this a new wave of religious paranoia? Do we need to re-evaluate the underlying themes of Halloween and children's involvement in such a holiday?

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Zanesville, Ohio: Recently Escaped Exotic Animals

(CNN) -- Terry Thompson, the Ohio man who authorities say set his exotic animals free just before killing himself, once supplied a lion cub for a photo shoot with supermodel Heidi Klum. "Thompson and his wild animal farm had long been on authorities' radar.

But while investigators kept a close eye on him, Thompson professed his love for his animals to most anyone. He would often be seen driving down the road with a wild animal.

"My cats are happier than most people," Thompson once told the Zanesville Times-Recorder. "I feed them every day, and they have a great place to live. How many people can say they have all they can eat and don't have to worry about a place to live?"

Yet on Tuesday, a strained marriage collided with the stress and the expense of caring for so many animals, people close to the investigation told CNN. "He was so depressed he said, 'That's it. I'm going to let them go,' " said Columbus Zoo director emeritus Jack Hanna, who helped authorities in the search for the wild animals.

The 62-year-old Thompson had been released from prison in recent weeks after serving a year behind bars on an illegal firearms conviction. Authorities say Thompson unlocked his animal cages, opened the farm's gates and shot himself to death.Thompson freed dozens of exotic animals -- from Bengal tigers to grizzly bears to baboons -- setting off a frightening scenario outside Zanesville, a town of 25,000 in central Ohio. Authorities killed at least 49 animals, including 18 rare tigers.

"What happened here was one of the largest animal escapes in our country's history," said Hanna. Sheriff Matt Lutz defended his officers, saying they had no choice but to kill the roaming animals. "I had deputies that had to shoot animals with sidearms at close range. That's how volatile this situation was."

The sheriff's department had been to the property on dozens of occasions over the last decade to check into reports of animal cruelty or animals on the loose. Thompson would stare down those who entered his property with his steely blue eyes. He'd cuss and scream. "I'll be damned," Thompson would shout, according to county Humane Officer David Durst. "I'll let them animals go!" "We were just afraid that this was going to happen. It wasn't a matter of if it was going to happen, it was a matter of when.

Opinion: Wild animals should be left in the wild

"The laws are so weak in Ohio, it's ridiculous. You can have one permit and pretty much have all the exotic animals you want." Added Hostetler: "For me the sad part of this is that the court system could've removed those animals, and it's really sad it reached this point." The Humane Society of the United States urged Ohio officials Wednesday to issue an emergency rule to crack down on exotic animal ownership. A previous emergency order issued by then-Gov. Ted Strickland that prohibited people convicted of animal cruelty from owning exotic animals expired in April. The Humane Society said Thompson "would almost certainly have had his animals removed by May 1, 2011, if the emergency order had not expired." When he was first sentenced to animal cruelty charges in 2005, Thompson told the judge: "I've learned a lot from this case, and I do love my animals.”

GROUP THREE DESCRIPTION AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS:

We chose these excerpts from the CNN website that discussed the recent animal fiasco in Zanesville, Ohio. Exotic animal owner, Terry Thompson, shot himself last Tuesday, October 18th, but before doing so, unlocked the cages where he kept his animals. The animals roamed from the area and worried local officials who were concerned for the safety of those residing in the area. Due to the critical time concerns, some animals were shot and killed when local police officers felt they had no other choice. This article discusses the argument of whether or not it was right that the animals were shot and killed as well as the argument of whether or not Ohio has strict enough laws regarding the ownership of exotic and wild animals. Who do these arguments appeal to? Is the source credible? Jack Hana took to his facebook and twitter to post, "I am so saddened by the tragedy in Zanesville, OH. The Columbus Zoo and Aquarium, the Wilds and I are doing all we can to help the situation on the ground. As always, public safety has to be the first priority. Our team is hoping to assist in the safe rescue of as many of these animals as possible." Does putting public safety first justify killing these animals, of which included 18 rare tigers? Do you think there should be a revision to the current Ohio law regarding exotic animals?

-Group 4

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Controversial Billboards Aimed at Overweight Kids

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xi6qom_controversial-billboards-aimed-at-overweight-kids_news

After viewing the news clip, what are your initial reactions about the billboards? Who do you believe the billboard is trying to reach out to? Is this billboard positively or negatively influencing our society? Will this ad actually benefit the obesity rate in America? Is this a credible source?

- Group 3

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

WIN A BABY!!

A radio station in Canada has advertised to give 3 in-vitro fertilization treatments to five lucky contestants to the "Win the Baby" contest. Hundreds of contestants entered the contest, all of which had to write several essays on why the deserved to win a baby. After several weeks of this, five contestants were chosen for the final drawing. These contestants were gathered into the radio station when the radio show host, Jeff Mauler, announced that they would all be winning fertility treatments. Later, Mauler said, "There was not a dry eye in the house" because of the joy the families felt. Although this may seem like an amazing opportunity, but there is a lot of controversy about the contest. The contest was criticized and was said to be false advertisement. Also, it made babies out to be objects and prizes to be won.

First off, Ontario, unlike their close neighbors in Quebec, does not have government-funded in-vitro fertilization treatments. This government policy angers a lot of the Ontario residents because in a recent poll 75% of Ontario residents support health insurance covered IVF treatments. Others say that the contest crossed a line by toying with the strong emotions women tend to have towards children. The contest is said to have false advertised because there is chance that they couples won't have a baby at all. It is also said that the contest has turned babies into a product, not a child that you should love and cherish.

Mauler and the families that won the contest disagree with this. One family openly thanked the contest for giving them a chance to have a baby.

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Critics call radio station's 'Win a Baby' contest exploitative

-Picture of advertisement to "Win a Baby" on radio's web page.

A radio station promotion that awarded five couples in vitro fertility treatments Tuesday as part of a “Win a Baby” contest has drawn the ire of Canadians on both sides of the issue.

Hundreds entered the contest held by Ottawa station Hot 89.9 for a chance to win a round of IVF treatments. After several weeks of having hopefuls campaign and write essays on why they should be chosen, the station whittled the competition down to five couples.

Hot 89.9 assembled the families in a room Tuesday, as posted on the station's website, and announced the award after a tense setup. “You’re all getting up to three fertility treatments. Congratulations!” radio host Jeff Mauler said as loud sobs from the women can be heard in the background.

“There's not a dry eye in the house,” Mauler said. "A lot of hugs and a lot of tears," he said describing the emotional scene in the room. “Once again with 'Win a Baby' all five of our finalists are getting three fertility treatments, up to three fertility treatments, and hopefully having their dreams come true.”

The contest has touched a political vein in Ontario, where residents - unlike their neighbors in Quebec - don't get government-funded IVF coverage. In July 2010, Quebec became the first jurisdiction in North America to fund IVF. Last month aCanadian survey showed that 75% of Ontario residents supported health insurance coverage for in-vitro fertilization treatments.

Despite the political sentiment, some say the contest crossed a line, playing on the emotions of women who want to have children.

“The station is clearly, clearly capitalizing on vulnerable patients that are desperate to have a family,” Beverly Hanck, executive director of the Infertility Awareness Association of Canada, told the Toronto Star newspaper.

She said the contest also should not be construed as actually giving the couples a baby, labeling it "false advertising, as IVF treatments can fail," the Star reported.

Toronto fertility counselor Jan Silverman called the contest "commodification of babies, turning babies into products," according to the Guardian newspaper.

The radio station has defended the contest. “Our goal was to help out those people who don’t have the money that really wanted a child desperately,” Mauler told the Star.

From video that the station posted on its website, Tracy Broad, who won the IVF treatment with her husband Nathan, is heard thanking the public and the radio station for the chance to be a parent.

“Words cannot describe how happy I am right now and how grateful I am for all the support and the love that we received. And it’s my 30th birthday today," she said to cheers from the other families.


Post by:
October 12th, 2011
08:09 AM ET

So our group forgot to put up questions, therefore we shall post some discussion questions now! Do you think that the "Win a Baby" advertisement promotes babies as a product you can win or as a child that you should love and cherish? How does the author of the article try and persuade the reader for or against the "Win a Baby" advertisement? Do you think that this was a good opportunity for the people that won this contest? Do you think the advertisement is playing with the emotions of women?

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

What We Learned

In this article, journalist Dave Biddle from bucknuts.com recaps last weekend’s loss to Michigan State. Specifically, the article focuses on what Biddle pins as the team’s ultimate downfall, coaching. While pointing out that he is an advocate of current head coach, Luke Fickell, Biddle acknowledges that it is extremely unlikely that Fickell will be back to lead the Buckeyes next year. He is sure to call attention to the fact that Fickell was put in an awkward position and is doing all he can to make the best of a bad situation. However, even if Fickell is viewed as a genuine guy in a rough spot, Biddle makes it clear in the rest of the article that the dismal play by the Buckeyes cannot be tolerated, and there must be a coaching change. Biddle gives an outline of the coaches that he expects to be considered for the job as well as a list of pros and cons for each coach. He ends by encouraging Ohio State football fans to begin an open discussion about who our next head coach should/will be. So, we would like to extend this question to our classmates and the rest of buckeye nation. What do you think of the current coaching situation? And who do you think would be a good fit for head coach at The Ohio State University?

Group 1

What We Learned: MSU 10 OSU 7

Welcome to our premium postgame feature What We Learned. Here we go following Ohio State’s 10-7 loss to visiting Michigan State in the Big Ten opener for both teams on Saturday.

We learned it's time to think about who the next head coach will be.

It’s difficult for me to write this, because I was certainly rooting for Luke Fickell to do well enough to earn the job long term, but it’s just not going to happen. It’s absolutely not all his fault – he was dealt a bad hand – but it is reality. He’s not going to be back in 2012 unless something miraculous happens the rest of this season. (Read: go undefeated the rest of the way, which will never happen.)

Urban Meyer is the logical choice to replace him, but it might not be the slam-dunk that many imagine. Does Meyer definitely want the job? Would Ohio State be willing to pay his assistant coaches what he would like? Keep in mind, SEC assistants make a lot more than Big Ten assistants. Does OSU have any concerns about Meyer, such as his health, or that he doesn’t tend to stay in one place very long? Those are all questions that beg to be answered.

Others that are sure to be mentioned: Nebraska head coach and former OSU player Bo Pelini, Boise State head coach Chris Petersen, South Florida head coach Skip Holtz (although maybe not after his team got smoked by Pitt on national TV Thursday night) and former OSU head coach John Cooper (just seeing if you were paying attention).

And there are sure to be many other candidates as well. (And no, Jon Gruden will not be one of them. Don’t even bring up something absurd like that. Gruden will either stay in the MNF booth, or he will return to being an NFL head coach. He has zero intentions of being a college coach.)

But the bottom line is that we’re seeing Fickell’s one and only year as OSU’s boss. He will always be a beloved figure in the Ohio State football community, but he’s not ready to be the head coach of a monster of a program like this one. Ohio State is no place for on-the-job training for head coaches. Fickell will be a fine head coach one day, but he’s not there yet.

And again, I can’t stress enough that the deck was stacked against him this season. He took over just a couple months before the season began with the program mired in turmoil. He’s had key players suspended. He’s had to break in a new starting quarterback. Actually, two of them.

Therefore, even the best head coach wouldn’t have won a national championship or even close with this team. However, the Buckeyes shouldn’t look this bad. They’re not just losing, they’re getting embarrassed in the process.

So, as it stands now, I cannot imagine a scenario where Fickell will be back as OSU’s head coach in 2012. So, get the rumor mill started on who will be the Buckeyes’ next head coach. It will be the main storyline from now until the new coach is named following the regular season. It will be interesting to say the least.

Written by Dave Biddle from bucknets.com